<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Schwab unloads US Trust Corp</title>
	<link>http://wealthfly.com/blog/2006/11/28/schwab-unloads-us-trust-corp/</link>
	<description>A blog for investment advisors, brokers and financial planners.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 08:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: WealthFly &#187; Is anyone else confused?</title>
		<link>http://wealthfly.com/blog/2006/11/28/schwab-unloads-us-trust-corp/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>WealthFly &#187; Is anyone else confused?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 23:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wealthfly.com/blog/2006/11/28/schwab-unloads-us-trust-corp/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>[...] Not to long ago Matt posted, that some of the actions by Charles Schwab may actually be good for the Independent Advisor. But it seems to me that Charles Schwab is saying one thing and doing another. They say they want independent advisors but their actions don&#8217;t come into line with this. Maybe they just want the Independent Advisors with more than a billion under management. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Not to long ago Matt posted, that some of the actions by Charles Schwab may actually be good for the Independent Advisor. But it seems to me that Charles Schwab is saying one thing and doing another. They say they want independent advisors but their actions don&#8217;t come into line with this. Maybe they just want the Independent Advisors with more than a billion under management. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
