<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another fund company sold</title>
	<link>http://wealthfly.com/blog/2007/02/05/another-fund-company-sold/</link>
	<description>A blog for investment advisors, brokers and financial planners.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Ramsay</title>
		<link>http://wealthfly.com/blog/2007/02/05/another-fund-company-sold/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Ramsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 12:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://wealthfly.com/blog/2007/02/05/another-fund-company-sold/#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Yet another reason to avoid Putnam.  They got into trouble in the first place by putting marketing ahead of their actual job- managing money.  Insurance companies are notorious for being run by marketing types.
For an example of a mutual fund company where they have their priorities exactly right, check out Dodge and Cox.  The only weak performance I can recall was the late 90s when they refused to blow bubbles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another reason to avoid Putnam.  They got into trouble in the first place by putting marketing ahead of their actual job- managing money.  Insurance companies are notorious for being run by marketing types.<br />
For an example of a mutual fund company where they have their priorities exactly right, check out Dodge and Cox.  The only weak performance I can recall was the late 90s when they refused to blow bubbles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
