It’s less of an endorsement and more of a desperate plea for Hillary to just go home. After going on record disagreeing with both candidates’ opposition to liberal trade, the Times claims the candidates’ “differences on policy look small and in reality are even smaller.” The Financial Times also recognizes Obama’s great oratory ability and Clinton’s lack of similar ability, calling her speaking style “grating.” Lastly, they point out that her campaign has been “a shambles,” which “does tell you something, especially if [Clinton] is running on a claim of management expertise.”

From the article:

After Tuesday’s vote, the Democrats should move quickly to affirm Mr Obama’s nomination. That is not just because his lead in elected delegates is already unassailable and the contest should be brought to a swift conclusion. It is also because he is, in fact, the better candidate.

The Democratic party has waited an awfully long time for a politician like Barack Obama. Enough already.

Ouch.